Representations Before Pixels:
Semantics-Guided Hierarchical Video Prediction

1. Archimedes, Athena Research Center | 2. valeo.ai | 3. National Technical University of Athens | 4. University of Crete | 5. IACM-Forth
ECCV 2026
✉ Corresponding author: e.karypidis@athenarc.gr

Abstract

Accurate future video prediction requires both high visual fidelity and consistent scene semantics, particularly in complex dynamic environments such as autonomous driving. We present Re2Pix, a hierarchical video prediction framework that decomposes forecasting into two stages: semantic representation prediction and representation-guided visual synthesis. Instead of directly predicting future RGB frames, our approach first forecasts future scene structure in the feature space of a frozen vision foundation model, and then conditions a latent diffusion model on these predicted representations to render photorealistic frames. This decomposition enables the model to focus first on scene dynamics and then on appearance generation. A key challenge arises from the train–test mismatch between ground-truth representations available during training and predicted ones used at inference. To address this, we introduce two conditioning strategies, nested dropout and mixed supervision, that improve robustness to imperfect autoregressive predictions. Experiments on challenging driving benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed semantics-first design significantly improves temporal semantic consistency, perceptual quality, and training efficiency (up to 7× faster generation and 14× faster segmentation convergence) compared to strong diffusion baselines.

Overview

Re2Pix decomposes video prediction into two stages. In Stage 1 – Semantic Feature Prediction, a frozen vision foundation model (VFM) encoder — DINOv2 — extracts dense semantic features \(h_{1:M}\) from the context frames, and a lightweight masked feature transformer autoregressively forecasts the future semantic features \(\hat{h}_{M+1:K}\), one frame at a time. These representations capture high-level scene structure while abstracting away low-level appearance. In Stage 2 – Semantics-Guided Video Generation, a latent video diffusion transformer operating in the WAN2.1 VAE latent space is conditioned on both the past and the predicted semantic features to denoise the future latents \(\hat{z}_{M+1:K}\), which the VAE decoder renders into photorealistic RGB frames. Separating what happens from how it looks lets each stage specialize — temporal reasoning first, appearance synthesis second.

Re2Pix framework overview during inference
Figure 1: Overview of the proposed Re2Pix hierarchical framework during inference. Stage 1 autoregressively predicts future VFM semantic features; Stage 2 conditions a diffusion transformer on the past and predicted features to generate future VAE latents, which are decoded into RGB frames.

Architecture & Robust Semantic Conditioning

Our diffusion transformer follows the video-prediction DiT design of Cosmos-Predict, retaining 3D-factorized RoPE, query/key normalization, RMSNorm and AdaLN-LoRA noise conditioning, while removing text cross-attention. Semantic guidance is injected by early fusion: the VAE latents are patchified (2×2), the VFM features are resized to the same grid, both are embedded independently and combined by channel-wise summation at the input — strong conditioning without increasing the token count.

During training the diffusion model sees clean, ground-truth future features, but at inference it must rely on autoregressively predicted ones that accumulate errors. Naively training on perfect features causes a severe train–test mismatch — sharp semantics but blurry pixels. We close this gap with two complementary strategies:

  • Nested dropout. The 1152 PCA channels of the DINOv2 features form a coarse-to-fine hierarchy. With equal probability we keep only the first \(c \in \{8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1152\}\) channels and zero the rest, forcing the generator to rely on robust, coarse semantics rather than memorizing fine-scale feature values.
  • Mixed supervision. Each batch mixes 90% ground-truth and 10% Stage-1-predicted features, directly exposing the generator to imperfect conditioning. The 90/10 ratio best trades off semantic consistency against perceptual quality.
Re2Pix architecture during training
Figure 2: Re2Pix architecture during training. VAE latents (with noise on the future frames) and VFM features (with nested dropout) are embedded independently and combined by channel-wise summation (early fusion). A denoising objective is applied to the future VAE latents; nested dropout and mixed supervision regularize against overfitting to idealized future features.

Comparison with Baselines

We compare against a standard latent video-diffusion baseline, two representation-alignment methods (REPA and VideoREPA), and a larger-capacity Baseline-Large. Re2Pix improves both semantic-consistency metrics (segmentation mIoU, depth) and generation quality (FID, FVD) — e.g. +2.98 mIoU(A), +4.65 IoU(M), −2.96 FID and −8.04 FVD over the baseline — while a purely parameter-scaled Baseline-Large stays well behind, confirming the gains come from the hierarchical design rather than model size. Re2Pix (Stage-1) reports the feature-space upper bound on semantic consistency.

Comparison with baselines
Table 1: Comparison with baselines on Cityscapes. Values in parentheses are the change relative to the Baseline (blue: improvement, red: degradation).

Accelerated Training Convergence

Training both models with a constant learning rate for 140k iterations, Re2Pix dominates the baseline throughout. It reaches FID 15 in 20k iterations versus 140k for the baseline — a 7× speed-up — with a matching 7× on FVD and a 14× speed-up on segmentation mIoU. This convergence boost comes at negligible cost: inference is 3.2s / 28.5 GB per scene (vs. 3.1s / 27 GB for the baseline), far cheaper than Baseline-Large.

Accelerated training convergence curves
Figure 3: Training curves for FID, FVD and segmentation mIoU. Re2Pix achieves a 7× speed-up on generation metrics and 14× on segmentation.
Computational cost comparison
Table 2: Inference time and peak memory per scene, and training time for 40k iterations. Re2Pix adds negligible inference overhead over the Baseline.

Scaling & Cross-Dataset Generalization

Trained on a larger mix of Cityscapes, nuScenes and CoVLA, Re2Pix consistently beats the baselines in-domain (Cityscapes, nuScenes) and zero-shot on KITTI. It also surpasses Vista — a 2.5B-parameter driving world model — and is competitive with Cosmos-Predict-2, despite both being pretrained with orders of magnitude more data and compute before being fine-tuned in our setting.

Results with extended training data and comparison to large-scale systems
Table 3: Re2Pix trained on extended data (Cityscapes + nuScenes + CoVLA). In-domain results on Cityscapes and nuScenes, zero-shot generalization on KITTI, and comparison against Stage-1, the baselines, and internet-pretrained systems (Vista, Cosmos-Predict-2) fine-tuned in our setting.

Ablation Study

All ablations are on Cityscapes with DINOv2-Reg ViT-B/14 features unless noted.

Impact of nested dropout
Table 4 – Nested dropout. Versus a fixed 1152-channel conditioning, nested dropout improves every metric, with the largest gains on FID/FVD.
Impact of mixed supervision
Table 6 – Mixed supervision. Ground-truth-only conditioning maximizes semantic consistency but collapses FVD; predicted-only reverses this. The 90/10 mixture is the best overall trade-off.
Sensitivity to the VFM feature extractor
Table 5 – VFM sensitivity. Swapping DINOv2 for SigLIP-2 in Stage 1 still beats the baseline across the board; the hierarchy is robust to the choice of VFM, with DINOv2 slightly ahead.
Impact of the fusion strategy
Table 7 – Fusion strategy. Early fusion outperforms AdaLN conditioning and cross-attention (the latter adding 265M parameters), at no extra parameter cost.
Number of semantic components at inference
Table 8 – Components at inference. Because nested dropout trains across feature dimensionalities, the number of PCA components can be chosen at test time; performance stays strong down to 128 components and degrades gracefully below.

Qualitative Results

Five representative Cityscapes scenes. Top: context frames with their DINOv2 PCA features. Bottom rows: ground truth, the diffusion baseline, Re2Pix, and the semantic features forecast by Stage 1 that guide Re2Pix. Re2Pix preserves scene geometry and object boundaries more faithfully and produces smoother, more stable future rollouts.

BibTeX

@inproceedings{karypidis2026re2pix,
  title     = {Representations Before Pixels: Semantics-Guided Hierarchical Video Prediction},
  author    = {Karypidis, Efstathios and Gidaris, Spyros and Komodakis, Nikos},
  booktitle = {European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},
  year      = {2026}
}